Taxing Our Patience

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

By CHARLES WALKER

Recently, The New York Times (Feb. 8) ran a front-page article that quoted a corporation boss as saying that a congressman was “selling one of the most powerful positions in the Congress, if not the government.”

Since then I’ve been waiting for follow-up investigative pieces, with more sordid, devilish details. Those articles, I expected, would be accompanied by fiery editorials demanding that authorities take immediate steps to root out the seeming corruption, and restore confidence in the national government’s allegedly most “democratic” institution. I’ve waited in vain.

According to The Times reporter, Democratic Representative Charles Rangel of New York is slated to become “chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, which shapes tax, Social Security, and Medicare policy,” provided the Democrats win a majority in this year’s elections.

“They throw it at me,” Mr. Rangel said, only half-kidding, about the money he is collecting to win back control of the House for the Democrats.” As chairman of the House tax-writing committee, Rangel would be in a powerful position to help or hurt citizens. For example, Rangel could attempt to reduce taxes on the needy, and make up the shortfall by raising the tax ante to the rich.

In other words Rangel could try to be a kind of tax-collecting Robin Hood. On the other hand, Rangel could follow the well-beaten path and help write tax bills and rules for the likes of those willing and able to fill up campaign coffers.

But can Rangel do both? The Times reporter says that Rangel wants people to believe that he can “juggle the concerns of the poor with the interest of the rich.” The reporter doesn’t provide evidence that Rangel can, but does make clear that whatever Rangel does or doesn’t do to the poor, he’s not going to wound the really wealthy.

For example, the chairman of the banking giant Citigroup says that “when you have an issue, he’s somebody you can talk to. And if what you are saying makes sense, he’s supportive.”

Rangel’s possible elevation to the chair of the tax-writing committee reportedly has attracted “chief executives, who relish a tax cut of any size and usually donate more money to Republicans…”

Rangel admits to sitting down “with a few unnamed, rich corporate heads in luxurious private clubs, simply [he claims] because they wanted to get to know him better.” Rangel also points with satisfaction “to the political friends he has among New York’s banking, Wall Street, and real estate moguls.”

No wonder then that “few Democratic members have helped raise more cash this year than Mr. Rangel…” Indeed, the reporter notes that the Democratic House election group “is awash in money. In a remarkable turnaround, the group had $19.8 million as of Dec. 31, more than double the amount of cash in the bank that its Republican counterparts in the House had.”

None of us should be shocked by political graft and influence peddling by capitalist politicians; it’s been around too long. But we do have every right to be outraged when the establishment press reports such obvious double-dealing, and indifferently goes on to the next story.

Related Articles

Capitalism’s World Economic, Political and Social Crises and the Road to Fight Back

By JEFF MACKLER
Led by the dominant capitalist-imperialist nations, especially the U.S. and China, the system involves the capture and transfer of surplus value from workers in poorer countries to leading corporations in the advanced countries. Today, global value chain corporations that represent only 15 percent of all trading firms worldwide, capture some 80 percent of total trade.

Debate in the Fourth International Part III: Capitalism’s World Economic, Political and Social Crises and the Coming Fightback

By JEFF MACKLER, for Socialist Action/USA
This is the third and final text presented by Socialist Action as a minority viewpoint to the February 19-23, 2022 meeting of the Fourth International (FI), an international socialist current of some 56 parties across the globe. Some 150 representatives of these parties gathered this year via Zoom due to the COVID 19 crisis to discuss and debate the Fourth International’s politics and program. The politics in the report below were adopted by the National Committee of Socialist Action/USA, a fraternal party of the FI barred by reactionary U.S. legislation from being a formal member of any international socialist organization. The text below was rejected by the February FI meeting by the vast majority of delegates. The central thesis of the majority text asserts that the building of revolutionary socialist parties on the Leninist model anywhere in the world today is not on the agenda. The text below, slighted updated to cover developments since the February FI meeting, challenges this view in all its fundamentals.